Russo-Ukraine War - The Soros-led uprising and the US-led Coup

 The Euromaidan Protests: Just Another Colour Revolution

The Euromaidan protests in Ukraine, which erupted in late 2013 and culminated in early 2014, marked a pivotal moment in the country's history. This western intelligence operation was coined the "Revolution of Dignity," and was a reaction to then-President Viktor Yanukovych's decision to suspend the signing of an association agreement with the European Union.

The Euromaidan protests were fuelled by a growing desire among some western Ukrainians for closer integration with Europe. The suspension of the EU association agreement was perceived by western NGO’s and intelligence agencies as a missed opportunity to break away from Russia's influence and foster deeper ties with the West.

Ukraine underwent the same challenges as Russia after the collapse of the USSR. Huge state assets were privatised creating the corrupt power-hungry Oligarchs. As such, it was always grappling with economic challenges, corruption, a sense of disillusionment with its leadership and even its sense of self. The very real socio-economic grievances, combined with Soros’ dissatisfaction over the government's perceived alignment with Russia, allowed him to mobilise his ‘civil society’ organisations to spark yet another colour revolution.

Pro-European sentiments were strong in the western region of Ukraine, where many believed that closer ties with the EU would open doors to economic opportunities and 'democratic' reforms. However, the Euromaidan movement only gained momentum through the deliberate efforts of Soros’ ‘civil society’ organizations comprised of students and activists. Peaceful demonstrations, rallies, and sit-ins in Kyiv's Independence Square (Maidan Nezalezhnosti) transformed the heart of the capital into a symbol of this resistance.

Not surprisingly, as a western psyop. the Euromaidan protests garnered significant attention from the mainstream media. Western countries, led by the United States and the EU, expressed solidarity with the demonstrators and called for peaceful resolution and dialogue. While under the table, agent Victoria Nuland was organising her more violent assets. 

US diplomats actively organised Ukrainian leaders and opposition figures during Euromaidan. Victoria Nuland was famously recorded in her ‘Fuck the EU’ call, setting up the Ukrainian government in a call to Geoffrey Pyatt where she was directing him to get their guy at the UN to legitimise the coup that was about to happen, before the Russians could ‘torpedo it’ in the UN. Two weeks after this call, Yanukovych is overthrown and Victoria Nuland’s ‘suggested’ government is established. Just another coincidence! 


Putin's Warning: Forcing Ukraine to Choose Will Divide the Country

In a highly significant speech, Russian President Vladimir Putin warned against the notion of forcing Ukraine to make an exclusive choice between aligning with Russia or the European Union. He argued that such a binary approach could lead to the division of Ukraine and exacerbate existing tensions in the region. 

At the time of Putin's speech, Ukraine was grappling with the Euromaidan protests. The situation had escalated into an international crisis, with tensions between Russia and the West at an all-time high.

Putin highlighted Ukraine's historical, cultural, and economic ties with both Russia and Europe. He emphasized that Ukraine's identity and geopolitical position have been shaped by these multifaceted connections, making it an intricate challenge for the nation to align exclusively with one side.

Putin cautioned against "pressuring" Ukraine to align with the EU, arguing that this approach would only deepen divisions within the country. He contended that such a move could potentially lead to a split between western and eastern regions, where pro-European sentiments were more prevalent in the west, while the east leaned toward closer ties with Russia.

The Russian President stressed the importance of preserving Ukraine's sovereignty and territorial integrity, calling for respect for the country's right to determine its own future without external interference. He advocated for a balanced approach that allows Ukraine to have friendly relations with both Russia and the EU.

Putin's speech was not a dismissal of Ukraine's ties with Europe or an attempt to assert Russia's dominance. Instead, it was an appeal for dialogue, understanding, and cooperation. He argued that a mutually beneficial relationship with both Russia and Europe would be more conducive to Ukraine's long-term stability and development.

Putin's speech resonated on the global stage, drawing attention to the complex nature of the Ukraine crisis and the need for a diplomatic resolution. It also shed light on Russia's concerns regarding the expansion of NATO and the potential consequences of a confrontational approach in the region. But do Neo-Cons listen?


Ousting President Viktor Yanukovych: The US led coup

During the Euromaidan protests, foreign NGO’s like those funded by George Soros played a crucial role in mobilizing citizens to express their demands for political change. They advocated for democratic governance, human rights, and transparency in government. Meanwhile, the more extremist factions led by Victoria Nuland were performing an violent seizure of power through creating chaos and panic.

As the protests intensified, shots were fired on the protestors. The perception of lethal force used against unarmed civilians led to a dramatic escalation of tensions and international condemnation. However, it has since been uncovered that this was a false flag. Another convenient example of a government doing the one thing that would cause the West to support the insurrection.

In the September 2015 issue of Oriental Review, Dr. Ivan Katchanovski, at the University of Ottawa, published a devastating paper on the Maidan killings setting out in extensive detail the conclusive evidence that it was a false flag operation and that members of the present Kiev regime, including Poroshenko himself were involved in the murders, not the government forces.

This investigation concludes that the massacre was a false flag operation, which was rationally planned and carried out with a goal of the overthrow of the government and seizure of power. It found various evidence of the involvement of an alliance of the far-right organizations, specifically the Right Sector and Svoboda, and oligarchic parties, such as Fatherland. Concealed shooters and spotters were located in at least 20 Maidan-controlled buildings or areas. The various evidence that the protesters were killed from these locations include some 70 testimonies, primarily by Maidan protesters, several videos of “snipers” targeting protesters from these buildings, comparisons of positions of the specific protesters at the time of their killing and their entry wounds, and bullet impact signs. The study uncovered various videos and photos of armed Maidan “snipers” and spotters in many of these buildings.

In February 2014, amidst escalating violence and pressure from opposition groups and the Western community, the Ukrainian Parliament voted to remove him from power, citing abandonment of his duties. The impeachment process was rushed and lacked adherence to established legal procedures. Crimea was still part of Ukraine at that time, Yanukovych hadn’t fled the country. Factoring in the false-flag operation, this was clearly a carefully constructed intelligence operation led by Victoria Nuland and carried out by their right-wing extremist assets.


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Russo-Ukraine War - Schisms, Agents, and Geriatrics... the Path to War

Russo-Ukraine War - A New Hope

Russo-Ukraine War - Tracing the Roots of the Conflict.