Russo-Ukraine War - The Globalists and Intelligence Agencies

 Colour Revolutions and Globalism: Soros and US International Influence

Colour revolutions are manufactured uprisings seeking political change and ‘democratization’, they have become a prominent feature of the geopolitical landscape in the 21st century. These movements are associated with Globalism, George Soros, the WEF and the CIA/MI6.

They are named for the symbolic colours associated with each movement (e.g., Rose Revolution, Orange Revolution, and others). They have occurred in various regions worldwide, including post-Soviet states, Eastern Europe, Asia, the Middle-East, South America and Africa. They arise in countries who oppose US interests.

The Globalists are driven by technological advancements, the increased power of global interconnectedness and control, along with their naïve neo-liberal belief in the ‘end of history’. This has facilitated the dissemination of ideas, information, and technocratic control across borders. This interconnectedness has provided fertile ground for technocratic elites, the weaponising of data, and strategic sharing of tactics between ‘pro-democracy’ extremists in different countries.

Colour revolutions are expressions of Western influence, with observers pointing to international actors, including governments, NGOs, and individuals, who play a critical role in funding and supporting opposition groups and activist organizations. 

George Soros's Open Society Foundations (OSF) are active in supporting activists, and dissidents under the guise of promoting ‘democracy’, and advocating for ‘human rights’. The OSF has provided financial assistance to various organizations that work to disrupt foreign governments and support radical activists groups.

Soros uses his wealth and the OSF to meddle in the internal affairs of sovereign nations. His funding of civil society groups and organizations has been instrumental in orchestrating protests and movements to bring about political changes that align with the WEF elitist technocratic dystopia.

Soros's name has been linked to various "Colour Revolutions," including the Rose Revolution in Georgia (2003), the Orange Revolution/ Revolution of Dignity in Ukraine (2004, 2014), and the Tulip Revolution in Kyrgyzstan (2005). In each case, large-scale protests led to changes in political leadership and a shift towards more pro-Western and anti-Russian orientations. They also have direct CIA involvement, with the agency providing funding and training to opposition groups, dissident organizations, fake-news media outlets, and social-media amplification to orchestrate and bolster these uprisings.

The CIA, established in 1947, has a dark history of involvement in criminal operations, drug trafficking, and coups around the world. During the Cold War, the agency engaged in various clandestine activities, supporting anti-communist ‘nazi’ movements and seeking to influence political developments in numerous countries.

Amid the dissolution of the Soviet Union and the subsequent emergence of post-Soviet states, the CIA saw opportunities to advance US interests by promoting any group who opposes their perceived enemy, including the openly Nazi Banderites. All while pretending it is for ‘democratic governance’ and Western values.

Globalism has facilitated transnational networks of ‘civil society’ organizations advocating for technocratic control, censorship, and transwokism. These organizations can serve as catalysts for change, empowering citizens to participate actively in the debasement of their own society.

Colour revolutions, the CIA, and globalism are interconnected in the modern era of geopolitics. Globalism has enabled the spread of technocratic elitest ideals and provided platforms for transwoke ecowarrior automatons and NAFO organizations to advocate for the destruction of themselves. 

The NATO Invasion and Assassination of Muammar Gaddafi

In early 2011, Libya became swept up in the colour revolutions known as the Arab Spring, driven by foreign NGO’s and amplified by CIA-controlled social media. They issued their usual bullshit demands for political reform, democracy, and human rights. Protests erupted across the country, and tensions escalated as Gaddafi's government responded to the CIA colour revolution.

Amidst the escalating violence and humanitarian crisis, the United States, along with NATO allies, intervened militarily in Libya under the pretence of protecting civilians. Instead, the US-led coalition launched airstrikes on Gaddafi's forces, significantly tipping the balance in favour of the rebel forces.

As the conflict raged on, Gaddafi's whereabouts became a subject of speculation and concern. In October 2011, Gaddafi was found hiding in his hometown of Sirte. After being captured by US-led rebel forces, videos emerged showing Gaddafi being brutally raped with a knife before he was shot dead. Hilary Clinton declared ‘We came, we saw, he’s dead!’ before cackling like the evil Satan worshiping witch that she is. 

The intervention and assassination of Gaddafi raised numerous legal and ethical questions. The US not only created the conditions for the civil war; but as usual, even in their pretence as peacemaker, they exceeded the UN Security Council resolution's scope. The focus was meant to be on protecting civilians and preventing a humanitarian disaster, not regime change. 

The intervention succeeded in murdering Gaddafi for daring to suggest an alternative to the petrodollar. The aftermath plunged Libya into chaos and instability. The power vacuum left by Gaddafi's death gave rise to competing armed factions, triggering a protracted civil war that has persisted for years, leading to widespread violence, displacement, and a humanitarian crisis.

The CIA's Role in the Creation of ISIS

The roots of ISIS can be traced back to the aftermath of the 2003 U.S.-led invasion of Iraq, which led to the toppling of Saddam Hussein's regime. The ensuing power vacuum and the marginalization of certain ethnic and sectarian groups created fertile ground for extremist ideologies to take root.

During the Iraq War, Al-Qaeda in Iraq (AQI) emerged as a prominent jihadist group, and its leader, Abu Musab al-Zarqawi, orchestrated a brutal campaign of violence against Iraqi civilians and coalition forces. AQI's operations and influence laid the groundwork for what would later become ISIS.

As the Syrian civil war erupted in 2011, Syria became a battleground for various armed groups seeking to overthrow President Bashar al-Assad's regime. After the utter disaster of Iraq, western populations were reluctant to get involved in the Middle-East again. Right on cue, the most violent and dangerous terrorist faction burst on to the scene – ISIS. 

ISIS, also known as Daesh, rapidly gained prominence in 2014 when it captured vast territories in Iraq and Syria, establishing a self-proclaimed caliphate. The group's extreme violence, including public executions, enslavement, and persecution of minorities, shocked the world and triggered global outrage.

The media played a pivotal role in shaping public perceptions of ISIS, often focusing on its brutal actions and sensationalizing the threat it posed. The coverage fuelled fear and anxiety, generating widespread demands for a forceful response to counter the group's expansion.

It has been pointed out that certain actors in the region *the CIA...cough...cough* and beyond might have directly supported ISIS to achieve their geopolitical objectives. The terrorist group became a useful tool to advance certain agendas and justify military intervention in Syria.

In 2013, the false-flag operation carried out by the ‘white-helmets’ staging the use of chemical weapons by the Syrian government in the Ghouta region sparked international outrage. The United States declared the use of chemical weapons a "red line" and threatened military action. However, public opposition to intervention and doubts about the evidence eventually led to a diplomatic solution involving the removal of Syria's chemical weapons stockpile.

As the conflict persisted, ISIS emerged as a powerful actor, diverting attention from the original focus on ousting Syrian President Bashar al-Assad. The rise of ISIS allowed NATO to conveniently reframe the intervention narrative, shifting the focus to combating terrorism and avoiding direct confrontation with the Syrian government.

The CIA provided covert support to certain anti-Assad rebel groups in Syria, including ISIS. The U.S. involvement in arming and training rebel groups in Iraq and Syria, with the goal of countering Assad's regime, created and perpetuated ISIS. 

While the CIA's direct role in the creation of ISIS is disputed, it is clear that the actions and policies of various actors, including the U.S., at the very least, played a part in the group's rise to power. However, when the public needs a more vicious baddy and a gas attack on civilians to get involved. Then, abracadabra, suddenly ISIS appears cutting off heads and Syria decides ‘fuck it’ let’s do the one thing that will cause the US to invade us. You have to ask yourself, how many coincidences does it take to change a regime?

The NATO Invasion of Syria in 2014 and Russia to the Rescue.

In 2014, the U.S. entered the conflict under the lame excuse of “degrading the position for ISIS.” The extremist group created by the CIA to manufacture consent for the U.S.-led coalition to take over the oil fields. The US State Department de facto admits that the Empire’s illegal occupation of a third of Syria - the part rich in oil and minerals currently being stolen – will persist, indefinitely.

The Syrian conflict quickly evolved into a proxy war, with various regional powers and global actors backing different armed groups. Russia intervened in 2015, supporting the Syrian government with airstrikes and military assistance. Russia's military involvement was primarily aimed at countering the growing influence of Islamist extremist groups and protecting its long-standing ally, the Syrian government. By providing military support through airstrikes, intelligence, and ground troops, Russia aimed to stabilize the Assad regime and secure its interests in the region.

The effectiveness of Russia's military operations in Syria soon became evident. Russian air force strikes targeted militant strongholds, infrastructure, and supply routes, crippling ISIS's capabilities and other opposition groups. Moscow demonstrated a level of precision and coordination that showcased its modern military capabilities and technological advancements.

Furthermore, Russia's deployment of advanced weapon systems, including cruise missiles and state-of-the-art fighter jets, showcased its military prowess on a global scale. The success of its military campaign in Syria also highlighted Russia's willingness to project power beyond its borders and protect its strategic interests in the Middle East.

Unlike their US counterparts, Russia via the Wagner PMC actually restored order and cleared out the ISIS threat. The US pirates just took over the oil fields from their ISIS stooges and to this day, continue to steal the mineral wealth of Syria. According to Damascus, Syria’s energy sector as a whole was robbed by an astonishing $107 billion between 2011 and 2022

While the U.S. and its allies pretended to target ISIS, their military actions led to civilian casualties and raised concerns about potential violations of international law. Syria’s permanent representative to the UN, Ambassador Bassam Sabbagh, has repeatedly denounced how the US Empire’s “theft of resources, oil, gas, and wheat” has plunged millions of Syrians into a state of insecurity, reducing a large part of its population to the status of refugees and victims of food insecurity.

Meanwhile, the Syrian conflict provided an opportunity for Russia to test and fine-tune its military capabilities in a real-world combat scenario. The lessons learned from Syria have likely informed Russia's military modernization and development efforts, further boosting its confidence in its armed forces. 

The conflict showcased Russia's willingness to use force to achieve its objectives and demonstrated its ability to project power far beyond its borders. This newfound assertiveness was seen as a departure from its more cautious approach in the post-Soviet era. As a result, Russia's military confidence surged, and it sought to assert its influence in other parts of the world, challenging the prevailing global order and asserting itself as a major player in international affairs.

Russia's military intervention in Syria was a transformative moment that significantly boosted its military confidence and reshaped perceptions of its capabilities. The success of its military operations, coupled with its geopolitical gains, demonstrated Russia's readiness to assert its influence on the global stage. As Russia continues to navigate complex international challenges, its experience in Syria will likely continue to inform its military and geopolitical strategies.